American Leftists Have Long History of Antisemitism

You might think that American leftist antisemitism began with the embrace by so many on the left of mass-murdering Muslim monsters after 9/11. Leftist antisemitism in America, however, has much longer roots. It turns out, for example, that the pro-Soviet Ivy Leaguers who dominated the US State Department at least through the 1960s, actively tried to prevent attempts by Americans to rescue Jews from the Nazi Holocaust. That's right--the very same smug, rich, elitist State Department leftists who admired Stalin's Soviet Union and fancied themselves the apparatchik rulers of a Soviet America aided and abetted Hitler's genocide of the Jews. You can read a bit about one non-Jewish American's efforts to rescue Jews and expose the antisemitic leftist State Department cover-up at the link below.

I should add that leftist antisemitism goes back even further in America than World War II. The leftist Populist movement of the late 19th century included a heavy dose of antisemitism. Many WASP farmers in the 19th century borrowed money to speculate in farm land much larger than they could farm, and when the Treasury's contractionary monetary policy caused deflation, the speculating farmer saw their real (deflation-adjusted) interest rates skyrocket. Borrowing cheap money and having to pay back in more expensive money made these speculators pretty cranky--and many of them blamed "Jewish bankers" or just "the Jews." The first generation of professional historians in America, the leftist Progressives, saw the Populists as representative of "the People" in their Marxist-inspired view of history as conflict between "the People" and "the Interests." So the leftist Progressives admired the leftist and antisemitic Populists, demonstrating a long history of antisemitism, both passive and active, on the American left.

http://www.wymaninstitute.org/duboiscont.php

Obama: I'll Make Friends With "Moderate" Taliban

Lately I have documented some of Obama's policies favoring the mass-murdering Muslim monsters in Hamas over the democratic Israelis. Obama has appointed no less than 7 pro-Hamas officials to oversee his foreign policy, and his Secretary of State, Hillary, has openly attacked Israel for not allowing illegal Arab settlements right in Israel's own capital, Jerusalem. During the campaign Obama disabled the credit card safeguards on his website so that Hamas terrorists could contribute illegal money to his campaign, and now he's paying them back by funding them in his latest Obama Omnipork $410 billion law. Am I forgetting anything?

Oh yes, during the campaign he promised to negotiate with Iran's Terrorist-in-Chief, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who wants to destroy both Israel and America, and is building nuclear weapons to accomplish our destruction. Even the UN, which American liberals seem to love and which in turn seems to love the world's terrorists and mass murderers, admits that it understated by a full THIRD the amount of uranium that the Muslim theocracy of Iran possesses. Iran's mass-murdering Muslim monsters now have more than a TON of uranium, enough to make their first nuke. (You can read the uranium story in the liberal New York Times at "Iran Has More Enriched Uranium Than Thought ," http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/20/world/middleeast/20nuke.html.)

Now Obama wants to further the cause of the Afghan mass-murdering Muslim monsters known as the Taliban. As a US Senator Obama voted to cut off funds from US troops fighting in Iraq, but in the end Bush listened to McCain and sent the surge of troops that finally won the war. American troops defeated both Sunni and Shiite militias, who were running around killing not just each other, but innocent Muslims as well. One might observe, indeed, that the mass-murdering Muslim monsters kill more Muslims than non-Muslims, and are in fact the number 1 murderers of Muslims in the world. Obama omitted the obvious on national television, that Bush had won the war in Iraq, and that Obama had been wrong about the surge. Unlike Americans and Israelis, who bend over backward to avoid accidentally hurting civilians, the mass-murdering Muslim monsters go out of their way to kill the innocent, even putting bombs in mosques to blow up as many fellow Muslims as possible.

Based on the success of Bush's surge in Iraq--which Obama curiously doesn't bother to attribute to Bush in the New York Times article below--and the fact that innocent Sunnis and Shiites in Iraq became our friends after we defeated the three groups trying to kill them, Obama now thinks that we've failed in Afghanistan, and that we can make friends with the "moderate" terrorists in the Taliban. The notion of making friends with "moderate" terrorists would be laughable were it not for the fact that many liberals are nodding their heads in agreement with Obama. Saying that we can make friends with the Taliban based on making friends with innocent Muslims in Iraq after defeating Iraqi terrorists is like saying that based on making friends with innocent Italians after defeating Mussolini and the Fascist Party, we could have made friends with Hitler and the Nazi Party in Germany.

If Obama truly wants to befriend innocent Muslims in Iraq, he needs to do what Truman did in Italy and Germany, and what Bush did in Iraq: defeat the mass-murdering monsters completely. If, however, Obama truly wants to aid the mass-murdering Muslim monsters in Afghanistan, as he's doing in Israel and Iran, then making friends with the Taliban is the way to go. And who knows? If Obama can get the mass-murdering Muslims in the Taliban back in power by 2012, maybe they too can make illegal contributions to his campaign.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/08/us/politics/08obama.html?_r=2&th&emc=th