It's about time that American Jews started arming themselves against mass-murdering Muslim terrorists (and the occasional homegrown antisemitic terrorist). I wish more of us would arm instead of believing the fairy story that government can protect us at all times everywhere by banning guns. If someone will break a law prohibiting MURDER, he's not going to think twice about breaking a law prohibiting gun possession.
http://www.breitbart.tv/chosen-guns-rambo-rabbis-grab-revolvers-for-synagogue-defense
Showing posts with label Muslim. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Muslim. Show all posts
Monday, September 7, 2009
Wednesday, September 2, 2009
American Leftists Have Long History of Antisemitism
You might think that American leftist antisemitism began with the embrace by so many on the left of mass-murdering Muslim monsters after 9/11. Leftist antisemitism in America, however, has much longer roots. It turns out, for example, that the pro-Soviet Ivy Leaguers who dominated the US State Department at least through the 1960s, actively tried to prevent attempts by Americans to rescue Jews from the Nazi Holocaust. That's right--the very same smug, rich, elitist State Department leftists who admired Stalin's Soviet Union and fancied themselves the apparatchik rulers of a Soviet America aided and abetted Hitler's genocide of the Jews. You can read a bit about one non-Jewish American's efforts to rescue Jews and expose the antisemitic leftist State Department cover-up at the link below.
I should add that leftist antisemitism goes back even further in America than World War II. The leftist Populist movement of the late 19th century included a heavy dose of antisemitism. Many WASP farmers in the 19th century borrowed money to speculate in farm land much larger than they could farm, and when the Treasury's contractionary monetary policy caused deflation, the speculating farmer saw their real (deflation-adjusted) interest rates skyrocket. Borrowing cheap money and having to pay back in more expensive money made these speculators pretty cranky--and many of them blamed "Jewish bankers" or just "the Jews." The first generation of professional historians in America, the leftist Progressives, saw the Populists as representative of "the People" in their Marxist-inspired view of history as conflict between "the People" and "the Interests." So the leftist Progressives admired the leftist and antisemitic Populists, demonstrating a long history of antisemitism, both passive and active, on the American left.
http://www.wymaninstitute.org/duboiscont.php
I should add that leftist antisemitism goes back even further in America than World War II. The leftist Populist movement of the late 19th century included a heavy dose of antisemitism. Many WASP farmers in the 19th century borrowed money to speculate in farm land much larger than they could farm, and when the Treasury's contractionary monetary policy caused deflation, the speculating farmer saw their real (deflation-adjusted) interest rates skyrocket. Borrowing cheap money and having to pay back in more expensive money made these speculators pretty cranky--and many of them blamed "Jewish bankers" or just "the Jews." The first generation of professional historians in America, the leftist Progressives, saw the Populists as representative of "the People" in their Marxist-inspired view of history as conflict between "the People" and "the Interests." So the leftist Progressives admired the leftist and antisemitic Populists, demonstrating a long history of antisemitism, both passive and active, on the American left.
http://www.wymaninstitute.org/duboiscont.php
Labels:
American,
apparatchik,
Holocaust,
Jews,
Josiah E. DuBois,
Jr.,
leftist,
Muslim,
Nazi,
Soviet Union,
Stalin,
State Department,
US
Tuesday, September 1, 2009
Antisemitism, Not Israel, Motivates Muslim Murderers
It's become trendy for anti-American leftists to blame 9/11 and other atrocities committed by mass-murdering Muslim monsters on Israel. "Blame the Jews" is an old game for the liars and the lazy, but now as always it's false. Muslim Arabs were murdering innocent Jewish men, women and children in the name of Allah long before the State of Israel existed.
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/7979/wknd-read-80-years-ago-there-was-no-israel-but-muslims-massacred-jews-anyway/
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/7979/wknd-read-80-years-ago-there-was-no-israel-but-muslims-massacred-jews-anyway/
Obama and Holder 'At War' with CIA
As I've been saying all along, members of the CIA are unsung heroes valiantly defending America from the mass-murdering Muslim monsters of radical Islam--the same monsters who, by the way, deliberately target the mosques of other Muslims--and we should be praising them (or at least letting them be) rather than attacking them, as Obama and Holder are doing. Now you can hear a little of the hidden story of how the CIA defends us silently from terrorists, like antibiotics fighting the latest lethal bacteria. Remember too that although the liberal media have been demonizing the CIA--excluding yesterday's remarkable article in the Post--the liberal career lawyers at the Justice Department signed off on the CIA's interrogation techniques, and Holder himself said he wouldn't do exactly what he's doing now. Do Obama and Holder really hate America SO much that they want to destroy our first line of defense again mass-murdering Muslim terrorists?
I fully expect Obama, Holder and their leftist pro-terrorist proxies to persecute Mr. Clizbe with all the powers at their disposal. To come forward like this Mr. Clizbe must have an extraordinary level of courage, but then we knew that from his CIA activities defending America.
I should add too that while the Obama-Holder prosecution represents in part an attack on the achievements of the Bush presidency, like no repeat of 9/11, it even more represents the culmination of decades of leftist hatred for the CIA, stemming from the CIA's dogged opposition to communism. The leftist hatred of the CIA goes back at least as far as 1953, when the CIA backed the Shah of Iran in a coup against a democratically-elected socialist prime minister, in order to prevent the possibility of the Soviets from having another puppet government in Iran, as they had when they'd left Iran after World War II. During the 1990s, with the Cold War over, the Clinton administration tied the CIA's hands by creating a "wall" between the CIA and the FBI, preventing the CIA from learning facts that might have allowed them to foil 9/11 as they have foiled ever terrorist attempt in America since. The Bush administration, whatever its other weaknesses (and it had many) made the wise move of dismantling the Clinton "wall" and untying the CIA's hands. For its success in stopping every single terrorist plot since 9/11, the CIA now faces the wrath of the left in the form of the Obama-Holder persecution.
It's ironic that the left so hates the CIA today. Harry Truman, who founded the CIA, actually leaned heavily to the left himself, as his unconstitutional efforts to seize control of the entire steel industry without even a law from Congress demonstrate. Back in Truman's day, however, it was possible to a leftist in America without hating America. Since Vietnam, however, the left in America has turned heavily anti-American. So as left as he was, I'd gladly take a Truman in exchange for an Obama and a Holder. Heck, I'd even give you an American-hating Michelle in the bargain!
I suspect that the CIA will survive the Obama-Holder war on it, but will it remain able to stave off constant terrorist threats with while defending itself from a pro-terrorist president and attorney general? Or will Obama and Holder, like Clinton and, well, Holder, so tie up the CIA that the terrorists succeed at another 9/11? We need a public outcry against the Obama war on the CIA to make sure it can continue to defend us from mass-murdering Muslim monsters who want to repeat 9/11.
http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/obama_holder_war_with_cia/2009/08/31/254698.html?s=al&promo_code=87B8-1
I fully expect Obama, Holder and their leftist pro-terrorist proxies to persecute Mr. Clizbe with all the powers at their disposal. To come forward like this Mr. Clizbe must have an extraordinary level of courage, but then we knew that from his CIA activities defending America.
I should add too that while the Obama-Holder prosecution represents in part an attack on the achievements of the Bush presidency, like no repeat of 9/11, it even more represents the culmination of decades of leftist hatred for the CIA, stemming from the CIA's dogged opposition to communism. The leftist hatred of the CIA goes back at least as far as 1953, when the CIA backed the Shah of Iran in a coup against a democratically-elected socialist prime minister, in order to prevent the possibility of the Soviets from having another puppet government in Iran, as they had when they'd left Iran after World War II. During the 1990s, with the Cold War over, the Clinton administration tied the CIA's hands by creating a "wall" between the CIA and the FBI, preventing the CIA from learning facts that might have allowed them to foil 9/11 as they have foiled ever terrorist attempt in America since. The Bush administration, whatever its other weaknesses (and it had many) made the wise move of dismantling the Clinton "wall" and untying the CIA's hands. For its success in stopping every single terrorist plot since 9/11, the CIA now faces the wrath of the left in the form of the Obama-Holder persecution.
It's ironic that the left so hates the CIA today. Harry Truman, who founded the CIA, actually leaned heavily to the left himself, as his unconstitutional efforts to seize control of the entire steel industry without even a law from Congress demonstrate. Back in Truman's day, however, it was possible to a leftist in America without hating America. Since Vietnam, however, the left in America has turned heavily anti-American. So as left as he was, I'd gladly take a Truman in exchange for an Obama and a Holder. Heck, I'd even give you an American-hating Michelle in the bargain!
I suspect that the CIA will survive the Obama-Holder war on it, but will it remain able to stave off constant terrorist threats with while defending itself from a pro-terrorist president and attorney general? Or will Obama and Holder, like Clinton and, well, Holder, so tie up the CIA that the terrorists succeed at another 9/11? We need a public outcry against the Obama war on the CIA to make sure it can continue to defend us from mass-murdering Muslim monsters who want to repeat 9/11.
http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/obama_holder_war_with_cia/2009/08/31/254698.html?s=al&promo_code=87B8-1
Labels:
America,
Bush,
CIA,
Clizbe,
Eric Holder,
Harry Truman,
heroes,
Iran,
Islam,
Justice Department,
Michelle Malkin,
Muslim,
Obama,
radical,
Shah
Monday, August 31, 2009
Liberal Washington Post Admits CIA Saves American Lives
Even the liberal Washington Post admits that CIA interrogation of mass-murdering Muslim terrorists saves American lives. Sure, the Post has to make at least a token questioning of the methods, but the evidence is so overwhelming that the CIA has saved American lives with enhanced interrogation that even the Post has to admit the truth for the change. Could this be a new trend of the liberal media at least grudgingly admitting the truth?! Nah, I doubt it. :-D
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/28/AR2009082803874.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/28/AR2009082803874.html
Labels:
American Solutions,
CIA,
interrogation,
liberal,
media,
Muslim,
Muslim terrorists,
Washington Post
Obama Fiddles While Iran Prepares to Burn--Israel
Obama fiddles while Iran's Jew-Butcher-in-Chief prepares to burn--Israel. Obama's favoring of mass-murdering Muslim monsters over Israel's democracy shows how far liberals have sunk since the days of Harry Truman, who rushed to recognize the new State of Israel in 1948 against a sea of hostile Arab Ba'athist (fascist foes). Even as recently as the 1990s, it was liberals who shouted loudest against the radical Muslim extremist like the Taliban.
Since 9/11, however, when Muslim terrorists became the most obvious threat to America, all too many liberals have, in their hatred of America, embraced them. Obama, the son of a Muslim north African Arab, went to a predominantly Muslim school as a child, raised funds for the PLO when it remained on the terrorist list where it belonged, accepted illegal campaign contributions from Hamas, and rewarded Hamas with $58 million in the "stimulus" earlier this year. So it's no surprise at all that Obama leans on Israelis to prevent them from preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons with which to obliterate Israel.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203863204574348533106427974.html
Since 9/11, however, when Muslim terrorists became the most obvious threat to America, all too many liberals have, in their hatred of America, embraced them. Obama, the son of a Muslim north African Arab, went to a predominantly Muslim school as a child, raised funds for the PLO when it remained on the terrorist list where it belonged, accepted illegal campaign contributions from Hamas, and rewarded Hamas with $58 million in the "stimulus" earlier this year. So it's no surprise at all that Obama leans on Israelis to prevent them from preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons with which to obliterate Israel.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203863204574348533106427974.html
Labels:
Ba'athist,
Harry Truman,
Iran,
Israel,
liberals,
Muslim,
Muslim terrorists,
Obama,
Taliban
Saturday, March 14, 2009
Obama: I'll Make Friends With "Moderate" Taliban
Lately I have documented some of Obama's policies favoring the mass-murdering Muslim monsters in Hamas over the democratic Israelis. Obama has appointed no less than 7 pro-Hamas officials to oversee his foreign policy, and his Secretary of State, Hillary, has openly attacked Israel for not allowing illegal Arab settlements right in Israel's own capital, Jerusalem. During the campaign Obama disabled the credit card safeguards on his website so that Hamas terrorists could contribute illegal money to his campaign, and now he's paying them back by funding them in his latest Obama Omnipork $410 billion law. Am I forgetting anything?
Oh yes, during the campaign he promised to negotiate with Iran's Terrorist-in-Chief, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who wants to destroy both Israel and America, and is building nuclear weapons to accomplish our destruction. Even the UN, which American liberals seem to love and which in turn seems to love the world's terrorists and mass murderers, admits that it understated by a full THIRD the amount of uranium that the Muslim theocracy of Iran possesses. Iran's mass-murdering Muslim monsters now have more than a TON of uranium, enough to make their first nuke. (You can read the uranium story in the liberal New York Times at "Iran Has More Enriched Uranium Than Thought ," http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/20/world/middleeast/20nuke.html.)
Now Obama wants to further the cause of the Afghan mass-murdering Muslim monsters known as the Taliban. As a US Senator Obama voted to cut off funds from US troops fighting in Iraq, but in the end Bush listened to McCain and sent the surge of troops that finally won the war. American troops defeated both Sunni and Shiite militias, who were running around killing not just each other, but innocent Muslims as well. One might observe, indeed, that the mass-murdering Muslim monsters kill more Muslims than non-Muslims, and are in fact the number 1 murderers of Muslims in the world. Obama omitted the obvious on national television, that Bush had won the war in Iraq, and that Obama had been wrong about the surge. Unlike Americans and Israelis, who bend over backward to avoid accidentally hurting civilians, the mass-murdering Muslim monsters go out of their way to kill the innocent, even putting bombs in mosques to blow up as many fellow Muslims as possible.
Based on the success of Bush's surge in Iraq--which Obama curiously doesn't bother to attribute to Bush in the New York Times article below--and the fact that innocent Sunnis and Shiites in Iraq became our friends after we defeated the three groups trying to kill them, Obama now thinks that we've failed in Afghanistan, and that we can make friends with the "moderate" terrorists in the Taliban. The notion of making friends with "moderate" terrorists would be laughable were it not for the fact that many liberals are nodding their heads in agreement with Obama. Saying that we can make friends with the Taliban based on making friends with innocent Muslims in Iraq after defeating Iraqi terrorists is like saying that based on making friends with innocent Italians after defeating Mussolini and the Fascist Party, we could have made friends with Hitler and the Nazi Party in Germany.
If Obama truly wants to befriend innocent Muslims in Iraq, he needs to do what Truman did in Italy and Germany, and what Bush did in Iraq: defeat the mass-murdering monsters completely. If, however, Obama truly wants to aid the mass-murdering Muslim monsters in Afghanistan, as he's doing in Israel and Iran, then making friends with the Taliban is the way to go. And who knows? If Obama can get the mass-murdering Muslims in the Taliban back in power by 2012, maybe they too can make illegal contributions to his campaign.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/08/us/politics/08obama.html?_r=2&th&emc=th
Oh yes, during the campaign he promised to negotiate with Iran's Terrorist-in-Chief, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who wants to destroy both Israel and America, and is building nuclear weapons to accomplish our destruction. Even the UN, which American liberals seem to love and which in turn seems to love the world's terrorists and mass murderers, admits that it understated by a full THIRD the amount of uranium that the Muslim theocracy of Iran possesses. Iran's mass-murdering Muslim monsters now have more than a TON of uranium, enough to make their first nuke. (You can read the uranium story in the liberal New York Times at "Iran Has More Enriched Uranium Than Thought ," http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/20/world/middleeast/20nuke.html.)
Now Obama wants to further the cause of the Afghan mass-murdering Muslim monsters known as the Taliban. As a US Senator Obama voted to cut off funds from US troops fighting in Iraq, but in the end Bush listened to McCain and sent the surge of troops that finally won the war. American troops defeated both Sunni and Shiite militias, who were running around killing not just each other, but innocent Muslims as well. One might observe, indeed, that the mass-murdering Muslim monsters kill more Muslims than non-Muslims, and are in fact the number 1 murderers of Muslims in the world. Obama omitted the obvious on national television, that Bush had won the war in Iraq, and that Obama had been wrong about the surge. Unlike Americans and Israelis, who bend over backward to avoid accidentally hurting civilians, the mass-murdering Muslim monsters go out of their way to kill the innocent, even putting bombs in mosques to blow up as many fellow Muslims as possible.
Based on the success of Bush's surge in Iraq--which Obama curiously doesn't bother to attribute to Bush in the New York Times article below--and the fact that innocent Sunnis and Shiites in Iraq became our friends after we defeated the three groups trying to kill them, Obama now thinks that we've failed in Afghanistan, and that we can make friends with the "moderate" terrorists in the Taliban. The notion of making friends with "moderate" terrorists would be laughable were it not for the fact that many liberals are nodding their heads in agreement with Obama. Saying that we can make friends with the Taliban based on making friends with innocent Muslims in Iraq after defeating Iraqi terrorists is like saying that based on making friends with innocent Italians after defeating Mussolini and the Fascist Party, we could have made friends with Hitler and the Nazi Party in Germany.
If Obama truly wants to befriend innocent Muslims in Iraq, he needs to do what Truman did in Italy and Germany, and what Bush did in Iraq: defeat the mass-murdering monsters completely. If, however, Obama truly wants to aid the mass-murdering Muslim monsters in Afghanistan, as he's doing in Israel and Iran, then making friends with the Taliban is the way to go. And who knows? If Obama can get the mass-murdering Muslims in the Taliban back in power by 2012, maybe they too can make illegal contributions to his campaign.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/08/us/politics/08obama.html?_r=2&th&emc=th
Tuesday, March 3, 2009
Are you part of the silent majority that supports Israel?
I hope that you will sign the petition at the link below in support of Israel, whether you're Christian or not. I did.
Israel has been fighting mass-murdering Muslim monsters since the days when we ignored them for the bigger threat of world communism. The mass-murdering Muslim monsters BLAME Israel for the mass-murdering that the mass-murdering Muslim monsters do: "If only we could murder EVERY Jew, we'd stop all the mass-murdering. Really we would. But since you won't LET us murder every Jew, just thousands per year, we have to murder YOU too," say the mass-murdering Muslim monsters.
Of course mass-murdering Muslim monsters have been murdering innocents, even other Muslims, for centuries. An unlike Christians, who didn't have such a great track record before the 19th and 20th centuries, mass-murdering Muslim monsters have a book that TEACHES them that Jews are subhuman and should be killed, indeed that Muslims should kill ALL infidels (which apparently includes other Muslims who don't agree with the mass-murdering Muslim monsters). To the Muslims who ignore the part of the Koran that tells them that the rest of us are all subhuman and must be exterminated, I say, "More power to you."
It used to be that American liberals hated Islam in general and Arab Muslim in particular for the way that Islam subordinates the individual to religious leaders and the way that Arabs treat women as property, or less than property, because you don't behead a car (or a camel) for behaving differently than you want it to. From the 1940s through 1960s liberals bore a great deal of responsibility for the US supporting Israel against the Arab Muslims who wanted murder every single Jew. Even as late as the 1990s it was American liberals, mostly in Hollywood, screaming bloody murder over the Muslim Taliban (not Arabs but Afghanis) in Afghanistan and how they oppressed, tortured and even killed women.
But two bad things happened to change all that: The Tet Offensive in Vietnam in 1968 turned American liberals against America, and the 9/11 bombing in 2001 demonstrated that mass-murdering Muslim monsters represented a grave threat to the America that so many liberals hate. So suddenly, the Islam that liberals had hated for decades became, in liberal parlance, "a religion of peace." Many liberals respond to any attempt to characterize the mass-murdering Muslim monsters as mass-murdering Muslim monsters by accusing of bigotry the victims and intended victims of the mass-murdering Muslim monsters. The liberal media even refused to report that the two Beltway snipers were both Muslims, yet reported in every single story that Madoff, the financial criminal was a Jew. Despite the presence of many Jews within postmodern liberalism--74% of Jews who voted in the 2008 presidential election voted for Obama, down only slightly from the 76% who voted or Kerry in 2004 and the 79%, a record high, who voted for Gore in 2000--postmodern liberalism has turned against the Jews, and now supports the mass-murdering Muslim monsters, precisely because the mass-murdering Muslim monsters share with many liberals a contempt for America.
You can find some of the biggest supporters of Israel, besides big-city, Jews ironically, among Christian social conservatives in small towns and rural areas. I say "ironically" because the liberal news and entertainment media consistently--one might say relentlessly--portray conservative Christians and small-town residents as ignorant, anti-Semitic bigots. I found far more anti-Semites, in the real world, living in Chicago than living in small-town Iowa. Big-city Jews and small-town social conservatives, sadly, almost never mix, and so big city Jews, who tend to rely on the liberal media fro all their "news," rarely even know that Christian social conservatives number among the staunchest allies of Israel. The very fact that the organization of Christians pushes this petition in support of Israel demonstrates some of the support that Christian social conservatives give to Israel. I hope, as I said at the outset, that you'll sign it whether you're Christian or not. I did.
http://www.cufi.org/site/PageNavigator/standing_pledge_Townhall1
Labels:
anti-Semites,
anti-Semitic,
big city,
Chicago,
Christian,
Christians,
Islam,
Israel,
Jew,
Jews,
liberal,
liberal media,
liberals,
Muslim,
Muslims,
small town,
social conservatives
Tuesday, February 24, 2009
Obama Releases Al-Qaeda Terrorist
Category: News and Politics
http://www.dontfreeterrorists.org/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)