Last week opponents of the Obama OmniPork bill flooded Congress with 25 THOUSAND emails. The public outrage at yet another multi-hundred-billion pork bill so soon after the last caused Senate Majority Leader and taxpayer-funded private jet flier Harry Reid to postpone the vote on the Obama OmniPork bill until next Tuesday in hopes that over the weekend people would forgot their opposition. So it's more important than ever that you use the link below to send another free email to your senators in opposition!
https://secure2.convio.net/cagw/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=571
Sunday, March 8, 2009
Saturday, March 7, 2009
Obama Gives Tax Money to Hamas
It weren't bad enough that Hillary publicly attacked Israel the other day, now, as you can read at the url below, Obama is covertly giving the mass-murdering Muslim monsters in Hamas your own hard-earned money. Obama has now appointed five pro-terrorist, anti-Israel miscreants to his administration--six if you count Arafat-hugging Hillary. But don't take my word for it--read the Jewish publication at the url below.
Before the election I tried to warn Jewish liberals--including members of my own family--that Obama opposed Jews and supported Muslim terrorists, but few listened, and one even stopped talking to me entirely for months (until the election had passed). Some 74% of Jewish voters for voted for Obama, leaving only a quarter, including the very liberal once-Democrat (and now independent but still caucusing with the Democrats) Joseph Lieberman, voting against Obama. I don't expect non-Jewish liberals to care about Israel. Iran could nuke Israel tomorrow, and most non-Jewish American liberals wouldn't care, and a few non-Jewish liberals would celebrate. American liberalism abandoned Jews and Israel in the 1990s--at that very time that Hillary was publicly hugging the wife of former Jew-Butcher-in-Chief Arafat.
But to the Jewish liberals who did vote for Obama I say: he's your president, and you're going to have to live with the consequences of voting for him. If I were you, I'd use those great Democrat connections you have to raise hell and high water to stop Obama from presiding over the destruction of Israel. Even if you're just a rank and file Democrat, or a pretend independent who's never actually voted for a Republican in a presidential election, call your US Senators and your US Representative, and demand that they hold hearings on Obama's appointment of anti-Israel nominees to his administration. I recommend that you demand that Joseph Lieberman oversee the Senate hearings to make sure that non-Jewish liberal Democrats don't turn the hearings into an anti-Israel witch trial. And if you do happen to be friends with Rahm Emanuel, call him up and demand that he do more to stop Obama from helping Hamas destroy Israel.
The funny thing is that I never have to warn socially-conservative Christians about threats like the one Obama poses to Israel. Christian conservatives are among the staunchest supporters of Israel, and few indeed would ever dream of supporting someone who had illegally raised funds for the PLO like Obama did in the 1990s, or taken illegal campaign contributions from Hamas, as Obama did in 2008. With 74% of Jewish voters voting for Barrack Hussein Obama in the last election, however, I'm embarrassed to say that at the moment, conservative Christian Americans support Israel better than liberal Jewish Americans. I hope that some of my liberals Jewish friends will stop worshipping Obama and start opposing his pro-Hamas policies, and fast.
http://www.jewishledger.com/articles/2009/03/05/opinions/edit02.prt
Before the election I tried to warn Jewish liberals--including members of my own family--that Obama opposed Jews and supported Muslim terrorists, but few listened, and one even stopped talking to me entirely for months (until the election had passed). Some 74% of Jewish voters for voted for Obama, leaving only a quarter, including the very liberal once-Democrat (and now independent but still caucusing with the Democrats) Joseph Lieberman, voting against Obama. I don't expect non-Jewish liberals to care about Israel. Iran could nuke Israel tomorrow, and most non-Jewish American liberals wouldn't care, and a few non-Jewish liberals would celebrate. American liberalism abandoned Jews and Israel in the 1990s--at that very time that Hillary was publicly hugging the wife of former Jew-Butcher-in-Chief Arafat.
But to the Jewish liberals who did vote for Obama I say: he's your president, and you're going to have to live with the consequences of voting for him. If I were you, I'd use those great Democrat connections you have to raise hell and high water to stop Obama from presiding over the destruction of Israel. Even if you're just a rank and file Democrat, or a pretend independent who's never actually voted for a Republican in a presidential election, call your US Senators and your US Representative, and demand that they hold hearings on Obama's appointment of anti-Israel nominees to his administration. I recommend that you demand that Joseph Lieberman oversee the Senate hearings to make sure that non-Jewish liberal Democrats don't turn the hearings into an anti-Israel witch trial. And if you do happen to be friends with Rahm Emanuel, call him up and demand that he do more to stop Obama from helping Hamas destroy Israel.
The funny thing is that I never have to warn socially-conservative Christians about threats like the one Obama poses to Israel. Christian conservatives are among the staunchest supporters of Israel, and few indeed would ever dream of supporting someone who had illegally raised funds for the PLO like Obama did in the 1990s, or taken illegal campaign contributions from Hamas, as Obama did in 2008. With 74% of Jewish voters voting for Barrack Hussein Obama in the last election, however, I'm embarrassed to say that at the moment, conservative Christian Americans support Israel better than liberal Jewish Americans. I hope that some of my liberals Jewish friends will stop worshipping Obama and start opposing his pro-Hamas policies, and fast.
http://www.jewishledger.com/articles/2009/03/05/opinions/edit02.prt
Friday, March 6, 2009
Hillary Attacks Israel
The news story about Hillary Clinton at the url below comes from the British liberal media news service, Reuters, lest any liberals try to write it off as a "conservative lie," which many liberals these days often do rather than face the truth.
During the last presidential campaign, I tried to warn liberal Jews, including family members, that Obama raised money for the PLO back when it appeared on the State Department's list of terrorist groups where the Jew-butchering group belonged, making a crime out of raising money for the PLO. Obama claimed he never knew the money he was raising went to the PLO--just as after 20 years at Trinity United Church of Christ, Obama claimed he never knew that "Reverend" Wright was a racist, anti-American anti-Semite. Obama also accepted illegal campaign contributions from the Jew-butchering terrorists of Hamas, actually disabling his website credit card safety protocols to allow them to contribute. Obama claimed to return the money--but only after Fox News broke the story, and the liberal media could no fully longer cover for Obama and had to admit that he had accepted Hamas (blood) money.
Some liberal Jews, however, made excuses for Obama, or at least claimed that the Jews in his campaign and the Democrats in Congress would make sure that Obama didn't pay back his Hamas contributors by hurting Israel. Back in 1973 during the Yom Kippur War, President Richard Nixon, despite his many other flaws, rushed billions of dollars in military aid to Israel to prevent the combined Arab forces of Egypt, Syria and Jordan, with help from Iraq and others, from overrunning Israel and killing every last Jew. In the face of another, even wider attack, combining Arabs and Iran, Obama need only sit back and do nothing--or more likely utter empty phrases of disapproval--and let the Jew butchers have their day. Obama needn't, I argued, even actively oppose Israel.
Now it turns out that the Obama administration, through Secretary of State Hillary, actually is actively opposing Israel. As part of their plan to destroy Israel, Hamas and its backers want the US to push Israel to give up Jerusalem, the capital of Israel. Why try to destroy Israel all at once, when Hamas can have its American allies do it for them a little bit at a time? Israel--which has demolished Jewish settlements against stiff opposition of the residents--is now demolishing some illegal Arab settlements, and Hillary has publicly attacked Israel for demolishing illegal settlements in its own capital, backing up the Hamas plan to start dismantling Israel one piece at a time.
Anyone surprised that Hillary would back Hamas against Israel simply isn't paying attention--or doesn't have a very good memory. When wife of the old Jew-Butcher-in-Chief, Yassir Arafat, came to America to raise funds from her liberal pro-terrorist allies, Hillary leapt up on the stage and hugged her. It's like an American senator leaping up on stage to hug Eva Braun had she made a trip to the US to raise funds to finish the death camps.
So when are the 74% of American Jews who voted for Obama going to wake up and see that Obama and Hillary, and indeed most of the Democrat left (with the obvious exception of Joseph Lieberman, himself a Jew) has abandoned pro-American Israel for the anti-American mass-murdering Muslim monsters? Will Iran have to rain down nuclear terror on Jerusalem and Tel Aviv first?
http://www.reuters.com/article/featuredCrisis/idUSJER0298222
During the last presidential campaign, I tried to warn liberal Jews, including family members, that Obama raised money for the PLO back when it appeared on the State Department's list of terrorist groups where the Jew-butchering group belonged, making a crime out of raising money for the PLO. Obama claimed he never knew the money he was raising went to the PLO--just as after 20 years at Trinity United Church of Christ, Obama claimed he never knew that "Reverend" Wright was a racist, anti-American anti-Semite. Obama also accepted illegal campaign contributions from the Jew-butchering terrorists of Hamas, actually disabling his website credit card safety protocols to allow them to contribute. Obama claimed to return the money--but only after Fox News broke the story, and the liberal media could no fully longer cover for Obama and had to admit that he had accepted Hamas (blood) money.
Some liberal Jews, however, made excuses for Obama, or at least claimed that the Jews in his campaign and the Democrats in Congress would make sure that Obama didn't pay back his Hamas contributors by hurting Israel. Back in 1973 during the Yom Kippur War, President Richard Nixon, despite his many other flaws, rushed billions of dollars in military aid to Israel to prevent the combined Arab forces of Egypt, Syria and Jordan, with help from Iraq and others, from overrunning Israel and killing every last Jew. In the face of another, even wider attack, combining Arabs and Iran, Obama need only sit back and do nothing--or more likely utter empty phrases of disapproval--and let the Jew butchers have their day. Obama needn't, I argued, even actively oppose Israel.
Now it turns out that the Obama administration, through Secretary of State Hillary, actually is actively opposing Israel. As part of their plan to destroy Israel, Hamas and its backers want the US to push Israel to give up Jerusalem, the capital of Israel. Why try to destroy Israel all at once, when Hamas can have its American allies do it for them a little bit at a time? Israel--which has demolished Jewish settlements against stiff opposition of the residents--is now demolishing some illegal Arab settlements, and Hillary has publicly attacked Israel for demolishing illegal settlements in its own capital, backing up the Hamas plan to start dismantling Israel one piece at a time.
Anyone surprised that Hillary would back Hamas against Israel simply isn't paying attention--or doesn't have a very good memory. When wife of the old Jew-Butcher-in-Chief, Yassir Arafat, came to America to raise funds from her liberal pro-terrorist allies, Hillary leapt up on the stage and hugged her. It's like an American senator leaping up on stage to hug Eva Braun had she made a trip to the US to raise funds to finish the death camps.
So when are the 74% of American Jews who voted for Obama going to wake up and see that Obama and Hillary, and indeed most of the Democrat left (with the obvious exception of Joseph Lieberman, himself a Jew) has abandoned pro-American Israel for the anti-American mass-murdering Muslim monsters? Will Iran have to rain down nuclear terror on Jerusalem and Tel Aviv first?
http://www.reuters.com/article/featuredCrisis/idUSJER0298222
Thursday, March 5, 2009
Oppose Unconstitutional DC Gun Ban
For the United States of America, Washington, DC isn't merely the political capital nor even merely the hubris capital; DC is the murder capital as well. For 32 years the DC city council imposed a gun ban so that law-abiding citizens of DC couldn't legally defend themselves, ensuring that only criminals had guns.
During 2008, however, the Supreme Court ruled in DC v. Heller that the DC ban on guns violates the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution. Lawrence Tribe, the leftist legal scholar and Bill Clinton's original first pick for the Supreme Court, a longtime advocate of gun-control, even admitted recently that, after studying the history of the 2nd Amendment, he could conclude only that the Founding Fathers meant it to protect an individual right to bear arms. (Tribe is therefore calling for the repeal of the 2nd Amendment, but I have to give him kudos for telling the truth about history, a rarity among leftists these days.)
The DC city council, however, in another show of what makes DC the hubris capital of the country, ignored the Supreme Court and kept a gun ban in place (after making a cosmetic change). Can you imagine the hue and cry we'd hear in the liberal media if a city decided, for instance, to ban first-trimester abortions in violation of Planned Parenthood v. Casey?! (For the many who don't know, Planned Parenthood v. Casey overturned Roe v. Wade's three-trimester rule, and replaced it with an "undue burden" rule, which basically allows the Court to toss out any abortion laws it doesn't like, and to keep any it does like.) The liberal media have not, of course, said a peep against DC for violating the Constitution, which the liberal media believes says whatever they want it to say, regardless of the facts.
Regardless of the hubris of the DC city council and the liberal media, however, Congress, which oversees DC, is moving to repeal DC's unconstitutional gun ban. Senator John Ensign of Nevada introduced an amendment to a DC voting bill to repeal the DC gun ban. The Senate passed the repeal of the gun ban by a 62-39 majority, meaning that many Democrats support the repeal.
Over in the House, however, Fuhrer Pelosi is trying to impose a gag rule to prevent Republicans from bringing the amendment up for a vote, knowing that she will lose that vote too because as in the Senate, too many House Democrats represent people who, unlike many big-city middle class folk, support the right to keep and bear arms. The only way for Fuhrer Pelosi to stop the repeal is to stop the vote in the first place--or kill the DC voting bill entirely. The DC voting bill, would, however, give DC its own US Representative, further padding the Democrats' House majority, so Fuhrer Pelosi isn't likely to just kill the bill.
Since the Democrats represent a constant threat to what remains of our liberty, I'd rather that they didn't grant DC--already grossly over-powerful in America--its own representative. Adding the gun-ban repeal to the bill might just kill the voting bill in the House, although adding the repeal didn't kill the bill in the Senate. At the very least, adding the gun-ban repeal to the bill would restore the freedom to defend themselves to the law-abiding citizens of DC.
You can help make the repeal happen by sending a free email to your representative using the url below. I did, and I hope you will too. I regularly email my US Senators and Representative, and they always respond. So far Senator Mark Warner and Representative Connolly have voted my way zero percent of the time, but Senator Webb, the so-called "moderate" Democrat, has voted my way a whopping 18% of the time! As we saw with the Kennedy-McCain Covert Amnesty act, when the grassroots overwhelmingly oppose something, even Democrats will abandon it. So please write your representative in support of repealing the DC gun ban now.
David
Oppose Unconstitutional DC Gun Ban
http://capwiz.com/gunowners/issues/alert/?alertid=12824711&PROCESS=Take+Action
During 2008, however, the Supreme Court ruled in DC v. Heller that the DC ban on guns violates the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution. Lawrence Tribe, the leftist legal scholar and Bill Clinton's original first pick for the Supreme Court, a longtime advocate of gun-control, even admitted recently that, after studying the history of the 2nd Amendment, he could conclude only that the Founding Fathers meant it to protect an individual right to bear arms. (Tribe is therefore calling for the repeal of the 2nd Amendment, but I have to give him kudos for telling the truth about history, a rarity among leftists these days.)
The DC city council, however, in another show of what makes DC the hubris capital of the country, ignored the Supreme Court and kept a gun ban in place (after making a cosmetic change). Can you imagine the hue and cry we'd hear in the liberal media if a city decided, for instance, to ban first-trimester abortions in violation of Planned Parenthood v. Casey?! (For the many who don't know, Planned Parenthood v. Casey overturned Roe v. Wade's three-trimester rule, and replaced it with an "undue burden" rule, which basically allows the Court to toss out any abortion laws it doesn't like, and to keep any it does like.) The liberal media have not, of course, said a peep against DC for violating the Constitution, which the liberal media believes says whatever they want it to say, regardless of the facts.
Regardless of the hubris of the DC city council and the liberal media, however, Congress, which oversees DC, is moving to repeal DC's unconstitutional gun ban. Senator John Ensign of Nevada introduced an amendment to a DC voting bill to repeal the DC gun ban. The Senate passed the repeal of the gun ban by a 62-39 majority, meaning that many Democrats support the repeal.
Over in the House, however, Fuhrer Pelosi is trying to impose a gag rule to prevent Republicans from bringing the amendment up for a vote, knowing that she will lose that vote too because as in the Senate, too many House Democrats represent people who, unlike many big-city middle class folk, support the right to keep and bear arms. The only way for Fuhrer Pelosi to stop the repeal is to stop the vote in the first place--or kill the DC voting bill entirely. The DC voting bill, would, however, give DC its own US Representative, further padding the Democrats' House majority, so Fuhrer Pelosi isn't likely to just kill the bill.
Since the Democrats represent a constant threat to what remains of our liberty, I'd rather that they didn't grant DC--already grossly over-powerful in America--its own representative. Adding the gun-ban repeal to the bill might just kill the voting bill in the House, although adding the repeal didn't kill the bill in the Senate. At the very least, adding the gun-ban repeal to the bill would restore the freedom to defend themselves to the law-abiding citizens of DC.
You can help make the repeal happen by sending a free email to your representative using the url below. I did, and I hope you will too. I regularly email my US Senators and Representative, and they always respond. So far Senator Mark Warner and Representative Connolly have voted my way zero percent of the time, but Senator Webb, the so-called "moderate" Democrat, has voted my way a whopping 18% of the time! As we saw with the Kennedy-McCain Covert Amnesty act, when the grassroots overwhelmingly oppose something, even Democrats will abandon it. So please write your representative in support of repealing the DC gun ban now.
David
Oppose Unconstitutional DC Gun Ban
http://capwiz.com/gunowners/issues/alert/?alertid=12824711&PROCESS=Take+Action
Tuesday, March 3, 2009
Say "NO!" To 8 THOUSAND Earmarks!
https://secure2.convio.net/cagw/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=571
Are you part of the silent majority that supports Israel?
I hope that you will sign the petition at the link below in support of Israel, whether you're Christian or not. I did.
Israel has been fighting mass-murdering Muslim monsters since the days when we ignored them for the bigger threat of world communism. The mass-murdering Muslim monsters BLAME Israel for the mass-murdering that the mass-murdering Muslim monsters do: "If only we could murder EVERY Jew, we'd stop all the mass-murdering. Really we would. But since you won't LET us murder every Jew, just thousands per year, we have to murder YOU too," say the mass-murdering Muslim monsters.
Of course mass-murdering Muslim monsters have been murdering innocents, even other Muslims, for centuries. An unlike Christians, who didn't have such a great track record before the 19th and 20th centuries, mass-murdering Muslim monsters have a book that TEACHES them that Jews are subhuman and should be killed, indeed that Muslims should kill ALL infidels (which apparently includes other Muslims who don't agree with the mass-murdering Muslim monsters). To the Muslims who ignore the part of the Koran that tells them that the rest of us are all subhuman and must be exterminated, I say, "More power to you."
It used to be that American liberals hated Islam in general and Arab Muslim in particular for the way that Islam subordinates the individual to religious leaders and the way that Arabs treat women as property, or less than property, because you don't behead a car (or a camel) for behaving differently than you want it to. From the 1940s through 1960s liberals bore a great deal of responsibility for the US supporting Israel against the Arab Muslims who wanted murder every single Jew. Even as late as the 1990s it was American liberals, mostly in Hollywood, screaming bloody murder over the Muslim Taliban (not Arabs but Afghanis) in Afghanistan and how they oppressed, tortured and even killed women.
But two bad things happened to change all that: The Tet Offensive in Vietnam in 1968 turned American liberals against America, and the 9/11 bombing in 2001 demonstrated that mass-murdering Muslim monsters represented a grave threat to the America that so many liberals hate. So suddenly, the Islam that liberals had hated for decades became, in liberal parlance, "a religion of peace." Many liberals respond to any attempt to characterize the mass-murdering Muslim monsters as mass-murdering Muslim monsters by accusing of bigotry the victims and intended victims of the mass-murdering Muslim monsters. The liberal media even refused to report that the two Beltway snipers were both Muslims, yet reported in every single story that Madoff, the financial criminal was a Jew. Despite the presence of many Jews within postmodern liberalism--74% of Jews who voted in the 2008 presidential election voted for Obama, down only slightly from the 76% who voted or Kerry in 2004 and the 79%, a record high, who voted for Gore in 2000--postmodern liberalism has turned against the Jews, and now supports the mass-murdering Muslim monsters, precisely because the mass-murdering Muslim monsters share with many liberals a contempt for America.
You can find some of the biggest supporters of Israel, besides big-city, Jews ironically, among Christian social conservatives in small towns and rural areas. I say "ironically" because the liberal news and entertainment media consistently--one might say relentlessly--portray conservative Christians and small-town residents as ignorant, anti-Semitic bigots. I found far more anti-Semites, in the real world, living in Chicago than living in small-town Iowa. Big-city Jews and small-town social conservatives, sadly, almost never mix, and so big city Jews, who tend to rely on the liberal media fro all their "news," rarely even know that Christian social conservatives number among the staunchest allies of Israel. The very fact that the organization of Christians pushes this petition in support of Israel demonstrates some of the support that Christian social conservatives give to Israel. I hope, as I said at the outset, that you'll sign it whether you're Christian or not. I did.
http://www.cufi.org/site/PageNavigator/standing_pledge_Townhall1
Monday, March 2, 2009
Obama: Taxes for You But Not For Me
I believe this is the fifth nominee of Obama's who has cheated on his income taxes. Cheating on your income taxes seems to have become the main credential for getting an Obama appointment. It's ironic that all these rich liberal elites who want to raise your taxes don't feel any obligation to pay the taxes they impose on the rest of us. They ranted and raved about "Bush tax cuts for the rich" which actually cut my rate, the bottom rate, from 15% to 10%, and so were tax cuts for the working poor, but then the rich liberal elites did not even pay the reduced taxes they owe after the Bush tax cuts!
I guess it should come as no surprise that the man who wants to trap all your kids in failed government-monopoly schools but sends his own kids to an elite private school would want you to pay taxes that he his cronies don't pay themselves.
David
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/wire/sns-ap-kirk-taxes,1,6611614.story?xid=rss-page
I guess it should come as no surprise that the man who wants to trap all your kids in failed government-monopoly schools but sends his own kids to an elite private school would want you to pay taxes that he his cronies don't pay themselves.
David
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/wire/sns-ap-kirk-taxes,1,6611614.story?xid=rss-page
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)